77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

refers to regulation that will come from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case regulation, also known as “common law,” and “case precedent,” offers a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, And the way They are really applied in certain types of case.

A survey of PACER people, conducted in 2021, measured consumer satisfaction and discovered areas for improvement with PACER services. The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts is using the survey results To guage and prioritize potential changes to PACER services and functions.

Section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to work as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application in the death penalty or life imprisonment depends within the specifics of each case, including any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.

The said recovery might be used, within the most, for corroboration from the main evidence, but by itself it cannot be described as a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of incidence. The reported memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as absolutely nothing was discovered on account of this sort of pointation. The place of prevalence along with the place of throwing the dead body were already from the knowledge of witnesses prior to their pointation via the petitioners. Reliance is also placed on case legislation titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it has been held through the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:

The recent amendment to Section 489-F with the Pakistan Penal Code signifies a progressive step towards effectively combatting counterfeiting activities. Through its expanded scope, heightened penalties, and technological considerations, the amendment aligns the law with contemporary challenges.

96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be effectively-settled that even though thinking about the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should think about the advantage of each of the eligible candidates and after because of deliberations, to grant promotion to this sort of suitable candidates who are found being most meritorious amongst them. For the reason that petitioner was held to be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed with the respondent department just to increase favor towards the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy over the part from the respondent department.

already been released from the jail completion of his term . Appeal dismissed on merits (Murder Trial)

thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that the moment the act of misconduct is founded and also the employee is found guilty after thanks process of law, it is the prerogative of your employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the varied penalties provided in law. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is just not proportionate with the seriousness of your act of misconduct just isn't enough nevertheless the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside of a structured and lawful manner. Read more

If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability in the matter, but could not be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this kind of ruling, the defendants took their request into the appellate court.

The DCFS social worker in charge of the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her 6-month website report on the court, the worker elaborated to the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

this Court is left with no option but to direct the respondents to inform the promotion in the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)

share or interest of a co-owner in immovable property could also sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or simply to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)

To obtain notification from the Supreme Court of Virginia and also the Court of Appeals of Virginia when opinions, orders, rule changes, dockets and other information has become offered, please enter your contact information beneath.